Free Essays on Human Rights

We are Our Brothers Keepers It is the moral obligation and duty of the United States to intervene when other countries violate human rights. According to the Constitution of the United States, it citizens preserve certain human rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There are many countries, which do not hold the same beliefs that the United States presents to its citizens. There have been many situations where the U.S. has intervened in the violation of human rights in other countries. Although not all countries have the same type of declaration of human rights, there should be limits on what can be done to citizens from any country. There are many moral issues at stake. Should other countries be allowed to mistreat, torture, or even in some cases kill their citizens? The answer to this question is definitely no. It is the moral responsibility of the United States to continue intervening in the violation of human rights in other countries. There should be certain things that no human bei ng should do to any other for any reason. Some of these countries are misusing their powers and there is no one there to stop them from doing so. In the world today we are faced with many dilemmas between civil and political rights. It is very important that each citizen must obtain these privileges and have equal opportunities. Every man or woman should have the freedom to speak out about his or her government and legislation with out fear of imprisonment or death. If the United States does not intervene when there are violations of human rights, there may very well never be a stop to it. The Holocaust of the 1930s can be used as an example of such treatment toward the citizens of Germany. Who gave one individual the power to segregate, mistreat, and kill people from their own country? Citizens of Germany (Jews) were victims of this situation because of their religious beliefs. The Jewish people did not have the military p... Free Essays on Human Rights Free Essays on Human Rights We are Our Brothers Keepers It is the moral obligation and duty of the United States to intervene when other countries violate human rights. According to the Constitution of the United States, it citizens preserve certain human rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There are many countries, which do not hold the same beliefs that the United States presents to its citizens. There have been many situations where the U.S. has intervened in the violation of human rights in other countries. Although not all countries have the same type of declaration of human rights, there should be limits on what can be done to citizens from any country. There are many moral issues at stake. Should other countries be allowed to mistreat, torture, or even in some cases kill their citizens? The answer to this question is definitely no. It is the moral responsibility of the United States to continue intervening in the violation of human rights in other countries. There should be certain things that no human bei ng should do to any other for any reason. Some of these countries are misusing their powers and there is no one there to stop them from doing so. In the world today we are faced with many dilemmas between civil and political rights. It is very important that each citizen must obtain these privileges and have equal opportunities. Every man or woman should have the freedom to speak out about his or her government and legislation with out fear of imprisonment or death. If the United States does not intervene when there are violations of human rights, there may very well never be a stop to it. The Holocaust of the 1930s can be used as an example of such treatment toward the citizens of Germany. Who gave one individual the power to segregate, mistreat, and kill people from their own country? Citizens of Germany (Jews) were victims of this situation because of their religious beliefs. The Jewish people did not have the military p... Free Essays on Human Rights It is common that human beings everywhere demand the realization of diverse values to ensure their individual and overall well being. Every American citizen has the ability to live his or her life free and full of equality, while also taking further steps in having a voice and power. As human rights extends its authority throughout many countries, it provides for people to live according to these and other desires. Yet there are still many problems that can oppose these rights that are given to us. On December 10, 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which then set the standards for human living. People now could express themselves in many ways without being abused from the severe political, legal, and social perspectives. They are enforced to governments, requiring compliance and enforcement so that they can’t deny our rights. These rights help us to be independent as well as be safe from any injustice that may occur. New laws, such as no distinction among races, sexes, language, religion, etc., formed a union of people who can accept one another and not segregate anyone. Justice is taking in effect when our rights grant us the freedom of equality before the law without any discrimination and not be subjected to arbitrary arrest. People can also be proven innocent under a grand jury instead of just being prosecuted as being guilty. Other Articles of this declaration, such as issues involving security, liberty, political, due process, welfare, and group rights, helps better unionize the people of the world. All these rights are here to protect us form many forms of injustice, yet there is still groups of people who deny these rights given to us. Many groups still have discrimination against people who they think is not suitable for the way of life because of them being who they are or what they do. The Ku Klux Klan, for example, condemns the righ... Free Essays on Human Rights The article â€Å"Human Rights as a Common Concern† by Charles R. Beitz a professor of government at Bowdoin College published in â€Å"American Political Science† review. As shown by the title of the article it is about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the human rights of everyone in individual nation-states. â€Å"The global human rights regime is almost certainly more influential today then at any time since World War I† (Beitz 269). The rights have been influential in the U.S. the most in the last few weeks. Beitz points out international human rights as partisan standards. His fist thought is what the international recognized human rights and the five separated categories. â€Å"The rights of the person refer to life, liberty, and the security or the person; rights associated with the rule of law include equal recognition; political rights encompass freedom of expression; economic and social rights refer to and adequate standard of living; rights of communities include self-determination and protection of minority cultures† (Beitz 271). As you look at these rights that are recognized by the nation-states they look very similar to the United States Bill of Rights. After the five categories Beitz tells about the rights of the individual nation-state gives to its people, for example, the FGM in Sahelian African. The following section, Beitz discusses neutrality and paternalism. â€Å" The evident partisanship of international human rights doctrine has led some philosophers to suggest that we should distinguish between the full set of values recognized as human rights in international law and or human rights proper† (Beitz 272). He also illustrates moral codes, different moralities and global moral pluralism. He gives the example of R.J. Vincent and his book about the â€Å"core of basic rights that is common to all cultures despite the apparently divergent theories.† Beitz also gives several other examples to support hi...